In your face corruption……”In addition to these gifts and $250,000 to Trump’s inaugural committee, Open Secrets reports that in 2016 the GEO Group’s own PAC invested $170,000 in the Trump Victory PAC.
Those investments paid off quickly. During his second week in office, then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions reversed the Obama administration’s order phasing out the use of for-profit prisons. According to Campaign Legal Center media strategist Corey Goldstone, their FOIA request to the Department of Justice revealed that the department was unable to justify the decision to go back to using private prisons.”
On May 2, a private prison corporation announced that it will reopen the only for-profit prison in the state of Michigan. The GEO Group said it expects the North Lake Correctional Facility in rural Baldwin to generate $37 million for the company in exchange for warehousing “criminal aliens,” or immigrants who have been convicted of crimes, including the federal misdemeanor offense of entering the country illegally.
The Federal Bureau of Prisons agreement to reopen North Lake is just one of the contracts the company has inked with the federal government since the Trump administration took power. That’s not a bad return on investment for the $395,000 in combined PAC and direct contributions that GEO Group made to various Trump-supporting PACs in 2016, including $225,000 that has attracted a lawsuit by the nonprofit Campaign Legal Center.
But while GEO Group is celebrating its success, others aren’t as pleased. Immigration advocates worry that people incarcerated in North Lake will be more than an hour from potential legal counsel and hundreds or even more than 1,000 miles away from their families. Criminal justice reform advocates are concerned because for-profit prisons operate even less transparently than government-run facilities.
The Campaign Legal Center is suing to try to force the Federal Election Commission to enforce the law which bars federal contractors from making campaign contributions. Local people are grateful for GEO’s $8.8 million pledge to upgrade the community’s sewers, but they also hope that this time, the company will actually hire some locals to fill some of the reopened facility’s better-paying jobs.
According to Ruby Robinson, a co-managing attorney with the Michigan Immigrant Rights Center, North Lake’s location isolates the people who will be incarcerated there from both family visits and legal representation. Baldwin, located in Lake County in Michigan’s northern lower peninsula, is up to an hour-and-40-minute drive from Grand Rapids.
“Baldwin is quite a distance from where the majority of Michigan’s population lives,” Robinson told Daily Kos. “It’s not easy to get there … and [the prison’s location] certainly has the effect of providing limited options for family members to visit. Also, if individuals need legal assistance, there is not a robust community of immigration law practitioners near Baldwin.”
This won’t be the first time that North Lake has held prisoners far away from family and sources of legal support. First opened in 1998 as the Michigan Youth Correctional Facility, GEO most recently housed 300 incarcerated persons from Vermont before closing for what seemed to be the last time in 2017.
Lauren-Brooke Eisen, a senior fellow with the Brennan Center’s Justice Program and the author of Inside Private Prisons: An American Dilemma in the Age of Mass Incarceration, said that housing immigrants in a for-profit prison may make it even more difficult for journalists and advocates to monitor the incarcerated people’s well-being or check up on conditions inside the prison.
“Transparency in our nation’s jails and detention centers is sorely lacking, and the problem with adding the additional layer of having a private firm involved is that it makes them even less transparent,” Eisen told Daily Kos. Eisen explained that while researching her book, she had a very hard time getting permission to visit for-profit facilities. She was only able to eventually do so through President Obama’s department of Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
In addition to being able to write contracts that could restrict the access of journalists and advocates, Eisen explained, for-profit prison companies aren’t required to comply with the Freedom of Information Act. That lack of transparency could prove to be an issue at North Lake given that, in 2012, a different GEO Group facility in Mississippi was cited in a federal report for allowing “a cesspool of unconstitutional and inhuman acts” to occur.
An advocate at the Campaign Legal Center said that at least one thing about GEO Group’s new success seems fairly transparent. In 2016, President Obama’s administration started phasing out the use of for-profit prisons. The day after that announcement, a wholly owned subsidiary of the GEO Group, GEO Corrections Holdings Inc., gave $100,000 to the pro-Trump super PAC Rebuilding America Now. Just before the election, GEO Corrections Holdings gave another $125,000.
In addition to these gifts and $250,000 to Trump’s inaugural committee, Open Secrets reports that in 2016 the GEO Group’s own PAC invested $170,000 in the Trump Victory PAC.
Those investments paid off quickly. During his second week in office, then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions reversed the Obama administration’s order phasing out the use of for-profit prisons. According to Campaign Legal Center media strategist Corey Goldstone, their FOIA request to the Department of Justice revealed that the department was unable to justify the decision to go back to using private prisons.
While the GEO Group PAC’s donations were made legally, Goldstone told Daily Kos that his organization is suing to try to force the Federal Elections Commission to sanction the company for the $225,000 donated by GEO Corrections Holdings.
“Public officials are supposed to make contracting decisions based on what is best for the public, not based on who spent the most money getting them elected,” Goldstone said. “If Trump’s [Department of Justice] didn’t reach its decision based on any research, evidence, or reports—like the [Office of Inspector General] report that informed the Obama administration’s policy—then perhaps it is reasonable to infer that GEO’s illegal contributions played a role.”