Allowing hemp to be grown next to neighbors in ag/residential zoning will diminish property values and problems will continue. Set backs only do so much……ordinances like this are causing the law “Right to Farm” to be challenged as a “taking” of personal property……. hemp pushes that envelope.
“The ordinance outlines areas where hemp cultivation will be allowed — within each of three agriculture-specific zones, as well as the county’s agriculture and residential zone and its resources and rural development zone, each of which favor agriculture as a permitted use. Other provisions include registration of cultivation sites, testing and setbacks from neighboring properties.”
Seven months after Sonoma County supervisors narrowly approved a ban on commercial hemp cultivation, the crop looks poised for a reset, with planning commissioners voting Thursday to recommend a new governing framework that would allow cultivation to move forward.
The Planning Commission voted 4-1 to advance rules favored by hemp advocates to supervisors, who will decide during a Dec. 16 meeting whether the rules are sufficient to reverse a ban they put in place April 2.
Sonoma County Supervisor James Gore, who along with Supervisor Lynda Hopkins led the charge last year in enacting the moratorium, said the proposal represented the kind of effort that the board had sought — a months long process to establish sound rules for a new crop. The moratorium, Gore said, bought the county time beyond the green light given in the 2018 Farm Bill, which legalized hemp.
“It was a knee-jerk to a knee-jerk,” Gore said.
The ordinance outlines areas where hemp cultivation will be allowed — within each of three agriculture-specific zones, as well as the county’s agriculture and residential zone and its resources and rural development zone, each of which favor agriculture as a permitted use. Other provisions include registration of cultivation sites, testing and setbacks from neighboring properties.
The measures are less restrictive than those adopted by the county for commercial cannabis, a close cousin of hemp that looks and smells quite similar.
The key difference is that hemp, by legal definition, has only trace amounts of the intoxicant tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC. Instead, the plant’s commercial promise lies in cannabidiol, or CBD, a compound already in wide use as a nonprescription remedy for chronic pain, anxiety, acne, insomnia and other conditions. CBD can be extracted from female hemp plants.
Hemp advocates welcomed the new rules, which mark the start of what Agricultural Commissioner Tony Linegar called an economic opportunity for farmers and Sonoma County’s $1 billion farm sector.
“I think the ordinance strikes a good balance between the neighbors’ concerns, the cannabis industry’s concerns, as well as the government’s concerns as it relates to the environment,” said Erich Pearson, founder of the SPARC dispensary network and a co-founder of the Cannabis Business Association of Sonoma County.
The Planning Commission required setbacks of 600 feet from occupied structures and 200 feet from property lines. It prohibited hemp cultivation in rural residential zones.
Planning Commissioner Pamela Davis, the panel’s lone no vote, said she opposed hemp cultivation in specific areas zoned “Agriculture and Residential,” citing previous opposition to cannabis operations near rural homes. Davis is an appointee of Supervisor Lynda Hopkins.
Linegar, who endorsed the ban in April, presented the proposed ordinance Thursday, and highlighted the need to diversify the county’s agricultural base. He gave a full-throated defense of the county’s Right to Farm Ordinance, which renders moot most complaints about agriculture-related noise, smells and side effects.
“We get people moving in, building mansions, not using the land for agriculture, and then complaining,” Linegar said. “I’m very disturbed by this. If we allow people to do this, we are eroding our right to farm.”
Some residents sought to stop hemp before it could begin, raising concerns about water use, crime, smell and plunging property values. Advocates, meanwhile, extolled the virtues of hemp as the potential cure for global warming, pointing to its ability to draw carbon out of the atmosphere and replace products made from fossil fuels.
“In a county that is ground zero for climate change, we need to make space for new industries, new crops that aid in the regenerative work that needs to be done and which provide the economic incentive to support farmers in staying on their land,” said Shivawn Brady, a Sonoma County Growers Alliance board member and vice president of regulatory affairs and compliance for Justice Grown, a cannabis business spanning six states, including California.
Advocates had a few concerns, including the proposed prohibition of hemp cultivation by people who have been cited for an unpermitted commercial cannabis violation.
Linegar welcomed a chance to revisit that provision, which wasn’t actually within the Planning Commission’s purview. The purpose of the measure, Linegar said, was to keep out bad actors who had made no effort to obtain proper permits rather than prohibit people with minor violations from participating in the hemp market.
Linegar said there’s a huge cross-section of people interested in entering the hemp market in Sonoma County. They could revive what Planning Commissioner Dick Fogg said he heard was once a thriving industry.
“I was told that by a guy who is even older than me,” said Fogg, 82, drawing laughter.
Those interested range from dairy farmers, flower and vegetable growers, wine grape growers and cannabis growers, according to Linegar.
If supervisors approve the new rules and the county moratorium sunsets as scheduled April 30, prospective hemp farmers could plant their first crop next spring.
Linegar said the time frame between any board approval and the end of the moratorium will be important for staff.
“That actually gives us time to put the program together,” he said.
You can reach Staff Writer Tyler Silvy at 707-526-8667 or at email@example.com. On Twitter @tylersilvy.